An analysis of the successes and failures of United Nations peacekeeping missions

Abstract

This dissertation introduces the United Nations’ peacekeeping efforts, often viewed idealistically as missions led by blue-helmeted personnel striving to foster global peace and security. However, this dissertation calls for a more critical examination of these missions, emphasizing the need to assess their success and failure with greater nuance. The paper focuses on dissecting the complex nature of peacekeeping missions through two detailed case analyses.The core aim is to investigate why some peacekeeping operations succeed while others fail. The paper does so by analyzing empirical data and identifying key factors contributing to these outcomes. The research is structured around two case studies, Lebanon, and Rwanda, and outlines the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of peacekeeping in those two cases. The paper explores the historical context, mandates, and social norms of United Nations peacekeeping, and the roles of international and state actors in shaping these missions. By providing a thorough examination of these elements, the paper seeks to uncover the underlying reasons behind the effectiveness or shortcomings of peacekeeping efforts, ultimately offering a comprehensive understanding of what influences their success or failure.