Διδακτορικές διατριβές
Μόνιμο URI για αυτήν τη συλλογήhttps://pyxida.aueb.gr/handle/123456789/63
Περιήγηση
Πλοήγηση Διδακτορικές διατριβές ανά Συγγραφέα "Benetatou, Kalliopi"
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω
Τώρα δείχνει 1 - 1 από 1
- Αποτελέσματα ανά σελίδα
- Επιλογές ταξινόμησης
Τεκμήριο Essays in optimal competition policy enforcement standardsΜπενετάτου, Καλλιόπη; Benetatou, Kalliopi; Athens University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics; Βέττας, Νικόλαος; Γκενάκος, Χρήστος; Λουρή, Ελένη; Κυριαζίδου, Αικατερίνη; Ζαχαριάς, Ελευθέριος; Μήλιου, Χρυσοβαλάντου; Κατσουλάκος, ΙωάννηςThe last 30 years are widely considered as witnessing in many jurisdictions throughout the world a substantial increase in the extent and sophistication of economic analysis and empirical evidence in the assessment of cases under the implementation of competition law. There have been many developments in the theoretical analysis of the choice of legal standards by Competition Authorities (CAs). These theoretical developments have not however been accompanied by an equally significant effort to analyse empirically the choice of legal standards by CAs. International organisations like OECD and others have been recording the rise of economists in CAs throughout the world trying to measure the role of economics from the input side. One of our main objectives in this thesis is to extend the empirical work undertaken by Avdasheva S., Golovaneva S. and Katsoulacos Y. (2019) for Russia in order to map the extent of economic analysis to the legal standard adopted by CAs, for the cases of two European CAs, those of Greece and France. Our main objectives have been to use this dataset to examine to what extent economic analysis and evidence is used in the decisions of the CA and how it evolves over time. For this purposes we collected and analysed a dataset of antitrust infringement decisions reached by the Greek & French CA between, which were appealed to Courts for annulment. Our results are consistent with recent arguments, according to which, the higher disputability of decisions as a result of increasing the extent of economic analysis under effects-based, increases the annulment rates of decisions under appeal. The second objective of this PhD thesis is to examine in depth the validity of one very important legal rule that characterises EU competition law enforcement, the Per Se Illegality rule associated with the restriction of Parallel Imports by dominant firms. Finally the last Chapter of the thesis addresses the highly debated issue of whether the Per Se prohibition of restrictions to parallel trade in EU is the right legal standard to use or whether an economic – Effects Based approach should be adopted. In this chapter we examine the optimal price strategy of the dominant firm when faced with parallel imports and its incentives to take measures that restrict the volume of parallel imports, given the difference in domestic and foreign prices, the fraction of domestic sales that parallel importers can satisfy and the ability of the firm to limit the activity of importers.